Thanks, it made me realize the datas of my city are not up to date :) I
thought : I wondered if I would see
https://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q16037012 (although the city is not that
big, but Rennes, a comparable on, showed up in the results, so ...) and it
did not.
There is redundancy in this area: the ''head of goverment'' of cities is
also present as a ''office heald'' : ''mayor of foo'', if
there is an item
''mayor of foo'' (and this seems better than just ''office
heald:mayor'').
Tom
2015-04-21 11:27 GMT+02:00 Daniel Kinzler <daniel.kinzler(a)wikimedia.de>de>:
Am 21.04.2015 um 00:50 schrieb Markus Krötzsch:
On 20.04.2015 23:47, Daniel Kinzler wrote:
> Something seems to be wrong with the order, though. Munich (pop > 1m in
all
> statements) is listed way after Chemnitz (pop
< 300k in all
statements). Any
idea why?
Good catch. My query was too simple (using one "random" population
instead of
the biggest one). Here is a better query, this
time even with
populations given:
I still wonder how the old result came about, since the *all* population
values
for Munich are much bigger than *all* the population numbers for Chemnitz.
Even
with picking a random value, how could the order have been reversed?
--
Daniel Kinzler
Senior Software Developer
Wikimedia Deutschland
Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V.
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l