Thanks, it made me realize the datas of my city are not up to date :) I thought : I wondered if I would see https://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q16037012 (although the city is not that big, but Rennes, a comparable on, showed up in the results, so ...) and it did not.

There is redundancy in this area: the ''head of goverment'' of cities is also present as a ''office heald'' : ''mayor of foo'', if there is an item ''mayor of foo'' (and this seems better than just ''office heald:mayor'').

Tom

2015-04-21 11:27 GMT+02:00 Daniel Kinzler <daniel.kinzler@wikimedia.de>:

Am 21.04.2015 um 00:50 schrieb Markus Krötzsch:
> On 20.04.2015 23:47, Daniel Kinzler wrote:
>> Something seems to be wrong with the order, though. Munich (pop > 1m in all
>> statements) is listed way after Chemnitz (pop < 300k in all statements). Any
>> idea why?
>
> Good catch. My query was too simple (using one "random" population instead of
> the biggest one). Here is a better query, this time even with populations given:

I still wonder how the old result came about, since the *all* population values
for Munich are much bigger than *all* the population numbers for Chemnitz. Even
with picking a random value, how could the order have been reversed?

--
Daniel Kinzler
Senior Software Developer

Wikimedia Deutschland
Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V.

_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l