Hoi, That does not clarify it. So what would we say ... it is in dispute sure but the way we work is that we have a child as a known person. So sources may dispute to their hearts content.. It is a relation that goes both ways.. How do we say novalue because it has to be a person ... "John Doe" does not apply. Thanks, GerardM
On 23 April 2015 at 11:37, Lydia Pintscher lydia.pintscher@wikimedia.de wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, Sorry for being dense.. What is wrong with there being no value ? Having
a
"no value" is imho understanding only a complication of saying nothing... Why not say nothing in the first place ?
It is important for cases like the following for example: Source A says "X had a child" and source B says "X had no child".
Cheers Lydia
-- Lydia Pintscher - http://about.me/lydia.pintscher Product Manager for Wikidata
Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. Tempelhofer Ufer 23-24 10963 Berlin www.wikimedia.de
Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e. V.
Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter der Nummer 23855 Nz. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.
Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l