Hoi,
That does not clarify it. So what would we say ... it is in dispute sure
but the way we work is that we have a child as a known person. So sources
may dispute to their hearts content.. It is a relation that goes both
ways.. How do we say novalue because it has to be a person ... "John Doe"
does not apply.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 23 April 2015 at 11:37, Lydia Pintscher <lydia.pintscher(a)wikimedia.de>
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Gerard Meijssen
<gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hoi,
Sorry for being dense.. What is wrong with there being no value ? Having
a
"no value" is imho understanding only a
complication of saying nothing...
Why not say nothing in the first place ?
It is important for cases like the following for example: Source A
says "X had a child" and source B says "X had no child".
Cheers
Lydia
--
Lydia Pintscher -
http://about.me/lydia.pintscher
Product Manager for Wikidata
Wikimedia Deutschland e.V.
Tempelhofer Ufer 23-24
10963 Berlin
www.wikimedia.de
Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e. V.
Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg
unter der Nummer 23855 Nz. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das
Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l