More to the point: What is the point to your agressive reply? If you're not interested in this thread then you are not obliged to be snarky about it. -Liam
On 22/10/2008, at 4:10, "Gerard Meijssen" gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, What is the point to the question, are regular contributors entitled to wear a halo or will they get wings to go with the halo ? Thanks, GerardM
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Ziko van Dijk <zvandijk@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hello, From time to time I ask myself (and others) what is a "regular contributor" to a Wikipedia language edition. According to "Tell us about your Wikipedia" the definitions are quite different. At eo.WP I once checked a week long (in this August) who was making edits, and I calculated a "regular contributor" if someone
- made at least one edit in that week
- obviously speaks Esperanto (is no "foreign helper" like someone who
does Interwiki linking)
- made his first edit at least six months ago
- made at least ten edits at all
My result was: 71, compared to 141 "active users" and 50 "very active users" (Wikimedia Statistics, May 2008). What do you think about this definition? Kind regards Ziko van Dijk
-- Ziko van Dijk NL-Silvolde
Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l