More to the point: 
What is the point to your agressive reply? If you're not interested in this thread then you are not obliged to be snarky about it. 
-Liam

On 22/10/2008, at 4:10, "Gerard Meijssen" <gerard.meijssen@gmail.com> wrote:

Hoi,
What is the point to the question, are regular contributors entitled to wear a halo or will they get wings to go with the halo ?
Thanks,
       GerardM

On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Ziko van Dijk <zvandijk@googlemail.com> wrote:
Hello,
From time to time I ask myself (and others) what is a "regular
contributor" to a Wikipedia language edition. According to "Tell us
about your Wikipedia" the definitions are quite different.
At eo.WP I once checked a week long (in this August) who was making
edits, and I calculated a "regular contributor" if someone
* made at least one edit in that week
* obviously speaks Esperanto (is no "foreign helper" like someone who
does Interwiki linking)
* made his first edit at least six months ago
* made at least ten edits at all
My result was: 71, compared to 141 "active users" and 50 "very active
users" (Wikimedia Statistics, May 2008).
What do you think about this definition?
Kind regards
Ziko van Dijk


--
Ziko van Dijk
NL-Silvolde

_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l