More to the point:
What is the point to your agressive reply? If you're not interested in
this thread then you are not obliged to be snarky about it.
-Liam
On 22/10/2008, at 4:10, "Gerard Meijssen" <gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hoi,
What is the point to the question, are regular contributors entitled
to wear a halo or will they get wings to go with the halo ?
Thanks,
GerardM
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Ziko van Dijk <zvandijk(a)googlemail.com
wrote:
Hello,
From time to time I ask myself (and others) what is a "regular
contributor" to a Wikipedia language edition. According to "Tell us
about your Wikipedia" the definitions are quite different.
At eo.WP I once checked a week long (in this August) who was making
edits, and I calculated a "regular contributor" if someone
* made at least one edit in that week
* obviously speaks Esperanto (is no "foreign helper" like someone who
does Interwiki linking)
* made his first edit at least six months ago
* made at least ten edits at all
My result was: 71, compared to 141 "active users" and 50 "very active
users" (Wikimedia Statistics, May 2008).
What do you think about this definition?
Kind regards
Ziko van Dijk
--
Ziko van Dijk
NL-Silvolde
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l