Dear GLAM & Libraries enthusiasts,
This is a gentle reminder that you have 2 more weeks left to submit
sessions for Wikimania this year. I'm actually writing you as the "Space
Leader" for Education & Medicine, and would like to encourage you to submit
to those spaces too, as some initiative with GLAM or Libraries, overlap
with Education or Medicine, you get the idea. :)
The Education Space specifically will host specific sessions for these
ovelaping topics, so please note that if you have a GLAM & EDU / Libraries
& EDU / GLAM & Medicine initiative, you are welcome to post it under the
Education space and note what else it relates to.
We encourage all of you to consider UNESCO's SDGs while you post your
submissions, and pay attention to different instructions for different
spaces.
Here's a link to the Education Space submission page -
https://wikimania.wikimedia.org/wiki/2019:Education
And here's a general link for submissions to all other Spaces -
https://wikimania.wikimedia.org/wiki/2019:Submissions
We look forward to your submissions and encourage you to share it far and
wide to partners around the world. :)
Best,
Shani, on behalf of the Wikipedia & Education User Group.
-----------------------------------------------
*Shani Evenstein Sigalov*
* Lecturer, Tel Aviv University.
* EdTech Innovation Strategist, NY/American Medical Program, Sackler School
of Medicine, Tel Aviv University.
* PhD Candidate, School of Education, Tel Aviv University.
* OER & Emerging Technologies Coordinator, UNESCO Chair
<https://education.tau.ac.il/node/3495> on Technology, Internationalization
and Education, School of Education, Tel Aviv University
<https://education.tau.ac.il/node/3495>.
* Chairperson, WikiProject Medicine Foundation
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiki_Project_Med>.
* Chairperson, Wikipedia & Education User Group
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_%26_Education_User_Group>.
* Chairperson, The Hebrew Literature Digitization Society
<http://www.israelgives.org/amuta/580428621>.
* Chief Editor, Project Ben-Yehuda <http://bybe.benyehuda.org>.
+972-525640648
Liebe BenutzerInnen, InteressentInnen und FreundInnen der ÖNB Labs!
Wir möchten über eine Veranstaltung der ÖNB Labs der Österreichischen Nationalbibliothek<https://labs.onb.ac.at/de/> am 12./13. Juni 2019 informieren.
Die ÖNB Labs sind eine Webplattform zum Forschen, Experimentieren und kreativen Arbeiten mit digitalen Beständen und Metadaten der Österreichischen Nationalbibliothek.
Die Veranstaltung besteht aus einem Workshop mit Gene Kogan und Sofia Crespo am 12.6. (nachmittags, 15:00-18:00 Uhr) und 13.6. (vormittags, 10:00-13:00 Uhr) und einem Labs-Symposium am 13.6. nachmittags, im Anschluss an den Workshop (14:30-18:30 Uhr).
Beim Workshop können TeilnehmerInnen Machine Learning-basierte Techniken erlernen und ausprobieren, um Datensets der ÖNB Labs zu synthetisieren, transferieren und zu remixen. Die Teilnahme ist frei, allerdings ist die TeilnehmerInnenanzahl auf 25 begrenzt. Der Workshop wird in Englisch abgehalten und erstreckt sich über beide Termine. Zum Workshop können Sie sich hier<https://www.eventbrite.de/e/machine-learning-using-the-onb-labs-tickets-616…> anmelden, wobei wir Sie bitten sich für beide Termine anzumelden wenn Sie teilnehmen wollen.
Das Symposium setzt die Präsentation neuer Services der ÖNB Labs und konkreter Projekte, die mit Daten der Österreichischen Nationalbibliothek arbeiten mit digitalen Strategien im Bereich der Kulturdaten in Beziehung. Das Programm und die Möglichkeit zur Anmeldung finden Sie hier<https://www.eventbrite.de/e/onb-labs-symposium-tickets-61031085620>.
Wir freuen uns auf eine spannende Veranstaltung!
Herzlichen Grüße,
das ÖNB Labs Team
Hello everyone,
We are trying to reconnect with the Israeli GLAM institutions, to give them
some inspiration with the amazing work you all do with your local
institutions.
So we are looking for updated information about successful GLAM
collaboration with small institutions. It will be great if you can share
your work with us.
Thank you in advance,
Gitit Podemski Marketing & Events Coordinator
<https://wikimedia.org.il/igul/>
Hello all,
I'm a new Wikimedian in Residence as part of the Linked Data for Production project<https://wiki.duraspace.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=104568167>. One of the goals of the project is understanding how libraries can contribute to and leverage Wikidata as a platform for publishing, linking, and enriching library linked data. A number of institutions that are part of the grant are working on projects involving Wikidata and we decided to start an interest group with biweekly meetings to discuss various aspects of Wikidata in support of the projects. Possible topics include Wikidata best practices, documentation, communication channels, policies, and tools.
At each meeting, myself or a guest will present some relevant material related to the topic and we’ll discuss any issues members have encountered as well as helpful resources. At the first meeting on April 23rd, we’ll talk about the purpose and goals of the group as well as the Wikidata related projects that are part of the grant.
I'd like to invite any interested Wikimedian community members to join us. The call details and communication channels are below.
First call details:
April 23, 2019 9am PST / 12noon EST / 5pm GMT / 6pm CET
Agenda: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BuszEQQxlOY14hK60Fl7n8Huvh6jEWXre0-wSvp…
Join: https://stanford.zoom.us/j/204437188
Communication:
Ld4-wikidata Google group: https://groups.google.com/d/forum/ld4-wikidata
#wikidata channel on LD4 Slack: http://bit.ly/joinld4slack
Notes in public LD4 Wikidata folder: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1JwTulCABs0TkGQDVSnYbIYEb7bC-j4-n
Website: https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/LD4P2/Wikidata+Affinity+Group
The Affinity Group is open to anyone interested, so feel free to share this invitation.
Cheers,
Hilary
Hilary Thorsen
Wikimedian in Residence
Digital Library Systems and Services
Stanford Libraries
Stanford, CA 94305
thorsenh(a)stanford.edu
650-285-9429
Hello everyone! Just a quick update on Structured Data on Commons
deployments.
You may have noticed that we haven't deployed Depicts statements yet
yesterday, and this is due to an unrelated bug.
The release has been rescheduled to upcoming Tuesday.
Cheers! Sandra
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Keegan Peterzell via Commons-l <commons-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Date: Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 10:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Commons-l] Depicts statements coming to Commons this week (15
April)
To: Wikimedia Commons Discussion List <commons-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>, <
wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Unfortunately the release was blocked by an unrelated bug [1], and must be
rescheduled. Releases are not done on Fridays, so the team has \rescheduled
for Tuesday, 23 April from 15:00-16:00 UTC [2]. I'll continue to keep the
community posted as release approaches.
1. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T221368
2.
https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Deployments#deploycal-item-20190423T1500
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 3:40 PM Keegan Peterzell <kpeterzell(a)wikimedia.org>
wrote:
> A notice that the team still plans to deploy depicts statements to Commons
> tomorrow, 18 April 2019, between 15:00-16:00 UTC. Feedback post-deployment
> is welcome on the SDC talk page:
> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons_talk:Structured_data
>
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 4:39 PM Keegan Peterzell <kpeterzell(a)wikimedia.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> (This message is also posted at the Commons Village Pump, and the SDC
>> talk page)
>>
>> The Structured Data on Commons [0] team plans to release support for
>> depicts statements this week, on Thursday, 18 April. The community's
>> testing over the past several weeks [1] helped identify and fix issues
>> before launch, and the development team spent time setting up extensive
>> internal testing to make sure the release goes as well as possible.
>>
>> This release is very simple, with only the most basic depicts statements
>> available. There is a significant amount of technological change happening
>> with this project, and this release contains a lot of background change
>> that the team needs to make sure works fine live on Commons before adding
>> further support. More parts to depicts statements, and other statements,
>> will be released within the next few weeks.
>>
>> A page for depicts has been set up at Commons:Depicts [2] As I can't
>> actually write instructive Commons policy or guidelines, I encourage those
>> who have tried out simple depicts tagging add a few lines to the page
>> suggesting proper use of the tool. I also encourage the use to be
>> conservative at first, as we wait for more advanced features within the
>> coming month or two as additional statement support goes live.
>>
>> I'll keep the community updated as the plans progress throughout the
>> week, the team will know better within the next day or two if things are
>> definitely okay to proceed with release.
>>
>> 0. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Structured_data
>> 1.
>> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Structured_data/Get_involved/Fee…
>> 2. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Depicts
>>
>> --
>> Keegan Peterzell
>> Community Relations Specialist
>> Wikimedia Foundation
>>
>
>
> --
> Keegan Peterzell
> Community Relations Specialist
> Wikimedia Foundation
>
--
Keegan Peterzell
Community Relations Specialist
Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
--
Sandra Fauconnier (she/her)
Program Officer, GLAM and Structured Data, Wikimedia Foundation
Twitter: @glamwiki
How Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums work with Wikimedia
communities: https://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM
Hello everyone,
One of the major additions of structured data to Wikimedia Commons is
arriving later this week: Depicts statements! See Keegan's message below
for more details and links.
With regards to visual arts, library and archival documents, and
specifically faithful representations of two-dimensional works and
documents: I would advise *not* to use the Depicts statement there, but to
wait for other statements to become available on Wikimedia Commons in
several weeks.
A separate property for that purpose has been created on Wikidata some time
ago: P6243 (digital representation of)
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P6243 - and it will only be possible
to use that in several weeks.
Depicts is probably appropriate for other cases though: in the case of
photographs of buildings, people, objects...
These are only rough first pointers. Modelling structured data on Commons,
and establishing best practices in that area, is - just like on Wikidata -
up to the community.
Many greetings! Sandra
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Keegan Peterzell via Commons-l <commons-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Date: Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 11:39 PM
Subject: [Commons-l] Depicts statements coming to Commons this week (15
April)
To: Wikimedia Commons Discussion List <commons-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>, <
wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Greetings,
(This message is also posted at the Commons Village Pump, and the SDC talk
page)
The Structured Data on Commons [0] team plans to release support for
depicts statements this week, on Thursday, 18 April. The community's
testing over the past several weeks [1] helped identify and fix issues
before launch, and the development team spent time setting up extensive
internal testing to make sure the release goes as well as possible.
This release is very simple, with only the most basic depicts statements
available. There is a significant amount of technological change happening
with this project, and this release contains a lot of background change
that the team needs to make sure works fine live on Commons before adding
further support. More parts to depicts statements, and other statements,
will be released within the next few weeks.
A page for depicts has been set up at Commons:Depicts [2] As I can't
actually write instructive Commons policy or guidelines, I encourage those
who have tried out simple depicts tagging add a few lines to the page
suggesting proper use of the tool. I also encourage the use to be
conservative at first, as we wait for more advanced features within the
coming month or two as additional statement support goes live.
I'll keep the community updated as the plans progress throughout the week,
the team will know better within the next day or two if things are
definitely okay to proceed with release.
0. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Structured_data
1.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Structured_data/Get_involved/Fee…
2. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Depicts
--
Keegan Peterzell
Community Relations Specialist
Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
--
Sandra Fauconnier (she/her)
Program Officer, GLAM and Structured Data, Wikimedia Foundation
Twitter: @glamwiki
How Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums work with Wikimedia
communities: https://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM
Yes, this is what I am driving at. I think there should be some greater clarity around what “depicted” means and I think it relates to “things”. This is why artwork is somewhat problematic as it is a meta-thing, a photo of a sculpture of an elephant is not a photo of an elephant, but rather we have a photo depicting a sculpture, which in turn depicts an elephant. But even “things” are somewhat in the eye of the beholder. The person who takes a photo probably knows what they intended to capture in it, say the grave of Jupiter Mossman, but someone else looking at the same photo might say “wow, a photo of the now-extinct Walla Walla tree” which happens to growing there.
As you suggest time and space are probably not “depictions” and we already have dates and location fields for images in any case, so that information is already captured.
Intangible concepts are another issue altogether.
Kerry
From: Estermann Beat [mailto:beat.estermann@bfh.ch]
Sent: Wednesday, 17 April 2019 4:02 PM
To: Wikimedia & GLAM collaboration [Public] <glam(a)lists.wikimedia.org>; Kerry Raymond <kerry.raymond(a)gmail.com>
Cc: Wikimedia & Libraries <libraries(a)lists.wikimedia.org>; North American Cultural Partnerships <glam-us(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Subject: RE: [GLAM] [libraries] Fwd: [Commons-l] Depicts statements coming to Commons this week (15 April)
Hi,
One could argue though that it would make sense to use different properties (to be implemented on Wikimedia Commons) to express temporal or spatial coverage of the image. The <depicted> property could be reserved to concrete Physical Objects, Events/Activities, Places, or Concepts (= subclasses of frbr:Subject).
Cheers,
Beat
From: GLAM <glam-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:glam-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org> > On Behalf Of Gnangarra
Sent: Mittwoch, 17. April 2019 07:53
To: Kerry Raymond <kerry.raymond(a)gmail.com <mailto:kerry.raymond@gmail.com> >; Wikimedia & GLAM collaboration [Public] <glam(a)lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:glam@lists.wikimedia.org> >
Cc: Wikimedia & Libraries <libraries(a)lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:libraries@lists.wikimedia.org> >; North American Cultural Partnerships <glam-us(a)lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:glam-us@lists.wikimedia.org> >
Subject: Re: [GLAM] [libraries] Fwd: [Commons-l] Depicts statements coming to Commons this week (15 April)
One is pretty obviously depicting the man Jupiter Mosman. But isn’t it also depicting an Aboriginal Australian? Isn’t it also depicting a prospector? Isn’t it depicting 1945? All of which are Wikidata items. But what about the photo of his grave? What is it depicting in Wikidata? Jupiter Mosman? A grave? A headstone? A tree? Charters Towers (the place)?
Yes if that is what it depicts then that is what it depicts, the whole of the depicts is to enable it to be found via wikidata queries... obviously some discretion and commonsense should be used in which aspects are worthy of being listed so "a tree" would be pointless
On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 at 08:31, Kerry Raymond <kerry.raymond(a)gmail.com <mailto:kerry.raymond@gmail.com> > wrote:
FWIW, I think there will be much greater take-up if the tool supports people identifying the depicted thing by referring to a Wikipedia article (and then, under the hood, connecting this back to the Wikidata item). There are a lot of Wikipedians who are either not aware of Wikidata, not interested in Wikidata, don’t understand Wikidata, or actively hostile towards Wikidata. Having a tool on Commons that defaults to their preferred Wikipedia (obviously with others selectable as desired) and letting them paste in the article title will engage a lot more people. And similarly, when viewing a File/Category on Commons, displaying the linked Wikipedia article(s) (rather than just displaying the Wikidata) will enable people to detect and correct errors more easily. People who contribute to Wikipedia and Commons usually do so within their areas of interest where they possess some subject knowledge, which we need if we are to have quality data in Wikidata.
One of my ongoing concerns about Wikidata is that a lot of modelling, populating and MixNMatching is done by people who are not “subject matter experts” (or even “subject matter aware”). This is leading to lots of errors in Wikidata because of that lack of subject knowledge. Once Commons file/categories get linked to the wrong Wikidata items, it worries me that most contributors with the subject matter knowledge won’t be able to detect this, or won’t be able to correct this themselves. (My own experience suggests it’s pointless to write on a Wikidata talk page as nobody responds, possibly because nobody is watching?).
Also, there are File descriptions that contain links back to Wikipedia articles, which are almost always to the depicted thing (if there are several links, it’s usually the first one). Similarly many categories have links back to Wikipedia articles and generally all the images in such categories are depicting that concept. I think having tool support to enable this information to be exploited would be beneficial. A human should be in the loop to confirm, of course, but at a lot less effort than doing the whole task manually.
Having said that, I am a little uncertain of the range of things that might be depicted. As Sandra suggests, it’s fairly obvious when dealing with individual people, individual buildings, although less clear when discussing group photos, streetscapes etc, where we normally use language like “3rd from the left in the back row”.
But a building exists in a town/suburb/district, so doesn’t the photo also depict the town/suburb/district as well as the building. Doesn’t it depict the time too?
Just to illustrate my point, here’s a couple of recent uploads I did:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Jupiter_Mosman
One is pretty obviously depicting the man Jupiter Mosman. But isn’t it also depicting an Aboriginal Australian? Isn’t it also depicting a prospector? Isn’t it depicting 1945? All of which are Wikidata items. But what about the photo of his grave? What is it depicting in Wikidata? Jupiter Mosman? A grave? A headstone? A tree? Charters Towers (the place)? Again, all of these things are in Wikidata. It seems to me that pretty much any category we have in Commons represents a concept and hence could/should be a Wikidata item. If that’s true, then we can automate a whole lot of “depicts” pretty easily.
Kerry
From: Libraries [mailto:libraries-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:libraries-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org> ] On Behalf Of Sandra Fauconnier
Sent: Wednesday, 17 April 2019 4:38 AM
To: Wikimedia & GLAM collaboration [Public] <glam(a)lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:glam@lists.wikimedia.org> >; Wikimedia & Libraries <libraries(a)lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:libraries@lists.wikimedia.org> >; North American Cultural Partnerships <glam-us(a)lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:glam-us@lists.wikimedia.org> >
Subject: [libraries] Fwd: [Commons-l] Depicts statements coming to Commons this week (15 April)
Hello everyone,
One of the major additions of structured data to Wikimedia Commons is arriving later this week: Depicts statements! See Keegan's message below for more details and links.
With regards to visual arts, library and archival documents, and specifically faithful representations of two-dimensional works and documents: I would advise *not* to use the Depicts statement there, but to wait for other statements to become available on Wikimedia Commons in several weeks.
A separate property for that purpose has been created on Wikidata some time ago: P6243 (digital representation of) https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P6243 - and it will only be possible to use that in several weeks.
Depicts is probably appropriate for other cases though: in the case of photographs of buildings, people, objects...
These are only rough first pointers. Modelling structured data on Commons, and establishing best practices in that area, is - just like on Wikidata - up to the community.
Many greetings! Sandra
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Keegan Peterzell via Commons-l <commons-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org> >
Date: Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 11:39 PM
Subject: [Commons-l] Depicts statements coming to Commons this week (15 April)
To: Wikimedia Commons Discussion List <commons-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org> >, <wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org> >
Greetings,
(This message is also posted at the Commons Village Pump, and the SDC talk page)
The Structured Data on Commons [0] team plans to release support for depicts statements this week, on Thursday, 18 April. The community's testing over the past several weeks [1] helped identify and fix issues before launch, and the development team spent time setting up extensive internal testing to make sure the release goes as well as possible.
This release is very simple, with only the most basic depicts statements available. There is a significant amount of technological change happening with this project, and this release contains a lot of background change that the team needs to make sure works fine live on Commons before adding further support. More parts to depicts statements, and other statements, will be released within the next few weeks.
A page for depicts has been set up at Commons:Depicts [2] As I can't actually write instructive Commons policy or guidelines, I encourage those who have tried out simple depicts tagging add a few lines to the page suggesting proper use of the tool. I also encourage the use to be conservative at first, as we wait for more advanced features within the coming month or two as additional statement support goes live.
I'll keep the community updated as the plans progress throughout the week, the team will know better within the next day or two if things are definitely okay to proceed with release.
0. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Structured_data
1. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Structured_data/Get_involved/Fee…
2. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Depicts
--
Keegan Peterzell
Community Relations Specialist
Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
--
Sandra Fauconnier (she/her)
Program Officer, GLAM and Structured Data, Wikimedia Foundation
Twitter: @glamwiki
How Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums work with Wikimedia communities: https://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM
_______________________________________________
GLAM mailing list
GLAM(a)lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:GLAM@lists.wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glam
--
GN.
Noongarpedia: https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wp/nys/Main_Page
WMAU: http://www.wikimedia.org.au/wiki/User:Gnangarra
Photo Gallery: http://gnangarra.redbubble.com
Out now: A.Gaynor, P. Newman and P. Jennings (eds.), Never Again: Reflections on Environmental Responsibility after Roe 8, UWAP, 2017. Error! Filename not specified. <https://uwap.uwa.edu.au/products/never-again-reflections-on-environmental-r…> Order here.