Well, it's not rectified yet. The one source I've given thus far is
not enough apparently. I have to add more.
The see also was not merely questioned before, it was removed (with
one edit summary being "seriously, wtf?")
LoS
On 10/24/11, Daniel and Elizabeth Case <dancase(a)frontiernet.net> wrote:
It seems this has been rectified the way it should be,
IMO: a separate
section about date rape has been added to the article, with a short,
reliably sourced graf. This is perfectly in keeping with WP:SEEALSO's dictum
that such links are fine in a less-developed article as long as the
intention is to eventually incorporate them into the article (in fact, I
would amend that passage slightly to suggest that it's even better to start
such a section yourself or at least bring it up on the talk page in
conjunction with such an addition).
Daniel Case
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap