Well, it's not rectified yet. The one source I've given thus far is not enough apparently. I have to add more.
The see also was not merely questioned before, it was removed (with one edit summary being "seriously, wtf?")
LoS
On 10/24/11, Daniel and Elizabeth Case dancase@frontiernet.net wrote:
It seems this has been rectified the way it should be, IMO: a separate section about date rape has been added to the article, with a short, reliably sourced graf. This is perfectly in keeping with WP:SEEALSO's dictum that such links are fine in a less-developed article as long as the intention is to eventually incorporate them into the article (in fact, I would amend that passage slightly to suggest that it's even better to start such a section yourself or at least bring it up on the talk page in conjunction with such an addition).
Daniel Case
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap