On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Steven Walling <swalling(a)wikimedia.org>wrote;wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Sydney Poore
<sydney.poore(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
Can you give an example of what you are
considering when you want to give
a sexually explicit image preference out of necessity.
For example if the only image uploaded of a United States State Park was a
nude female laying on a blanket in tent and masturbating in the the state
park, would you say that it should be included so we have an image of the
State Park?
Sydney
I think it's valuable that we seem to have reached consensus that
sexualized media is one factor in this whole effort to attract and retain
women editors.
But rather than continuing a general discussion about what degree of sexual
content is okay, how about we take what we've discussed and add it to a list
of issues that affect the gender gap? I just want to make sure we stay
focused on welcoming women editors here, rather than on controversial
content at large.
--
Steven Walling
Fellow at Wikimedia Foundation
wikimediafoundation.org
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap