On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Steven Walling <swalling@wikimedia.org> wrote:

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Sydney Poore <sydney.poore@gmail.com> wrote:

Can you give an example of what you are considering when you want to give a sexually explicit image preference out of necessity.

For example if the only image uploaded of a United States State Park was a nude female laying on a blanket in tent and masturbating in the the state park, would you say that it should be included so we have an image of the State Park?

Sydney

I think it's valuable that we seem to have reached consensus that sexualized media is one factor in this whole effort to attract and retain women editors.

But rather than continuing a general discussion about what degree of sexual content is okay, how about we take what we've discussed and add it to a list of issues that affect the gender gap? I just want to make sure we stay focused on welcoming women editors here, rather than on controversial content at large.

--
Steven Walling
Fellow at Wikimedia Foundation
wikimediafoundation.org

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap