Now done - see http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Proposals_for_more_female_editor...
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Steven Walling swalling@wikimedia.orgwrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Sydney Poore sydney.poore@gmail.comwrote:
Can you give an example of what you are considering when you want to give a sexually explicit image preference out of necessity.
For example if the only image uploaded of a United States State Park was a nude female laying on a blanket in tent and masturbating in the the state park, would you say that it should be included so we have an image of the State Park?
Sydney
I think it's valuable that we seem to have reached consensus that sexualized media is one factor in this whole effort to attract and retain women editors.
But rather than continuing a general discussion about what degree of sexual content is okay, how about we take what we've discussed and add it to a list of issues that affect the gender gap? I just want to make sure we stay focused on welcoming women editors here, rather than on controversial content at large.
-- Steven Walling Fellow at Wikimedia Foundation wikimediafoundation.org
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap