On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 12:22 PM, John Vandenberg jayvdb@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Andreas Kolbe jayen466@gmail.com wrote:
No one here has commented on the fact that the German Wikipedia article
uses
a special, local version of one of Seedfeeder's images. The German
version
is more amateurish, and a little more nasty. Compare:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Wiki-facial_cumshot.png http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Wiki-cumshot.png
I noticed that.
However, the German article focuses on the use in pornography, and the nastier image is more appropriate in that setting.
Personally, I thought the extra bit of nastiness unnecessary (especially combined with the lack of drawing expertise in execution).
The English article about [[Cum shot]] drifts into areas that are more sexuality than pornography, often reproducing content which is on [[Facial (sex act)]]. German Wikipedia doesnt appear to have an article about the sexual act.
A cumshot is not a sexual act, but a photographic recording of a sexual act ("shot" refers to the photography, not the ejaculation).
Andreas