On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 12:22 PM, John Vandenberg <jayvdb@gmail.com> wrote:

On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Andreas Kolbe <jayen466@gmail.com> wrote:
> No one here has commented on the fact that the German Wikipedia article uses
> a special, local version of one of Seedfeeder's images. The German version
> is more amateurish, and a little more nasty. Compare:
>
> http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Wiki-facial_cumshot.png
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Wiki-cumshot.png

I noticed that.

However, the German article focuses on the use in pornography, and the
nastier image is more appropriate in that setting.

Personally, I thought the extra bit of nastiness unnecessary (especially combined with the lack of drawing expertise in execution).

The English article about [[Cum shot]] drifts into areas that are more
sexuality than pornography, often reproducing content which is on
[[Facial (sex act)]]. German Wikipedia doesnt appear to have an
article about the sexual act.

A cumshot is not a sexual act, but a photographic recording of a sexual act ("shot" refers to the photography, not the ejaculation).

Andreas