On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 12:22 PM, John Vandenberg <jayvdb(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Andreas Kolbe
<jayen466(a)gmail.com> wrote:
No one here has commented on the fact that the
German Wikipedia article
uses
a special, local version of one of
Seedfeeder's images. The German
version
I noticed that.
However, the German article focuses on the use in pornography, and the
nastier image is more appropriate in that setting.
Personally, I thought the extra bit of nastiness unnecessary (especially
combined with the lack of drawing expertise in execution).
The English article about [[Cum shot]] drifts into
areas that are more
sexuality than pornography, often reproducing content which is on
[[Facial (sex act)]]. German Wikipedia doesnt appear to have an
article about the sexual act.
A cumshot is not a sexual act, but a photographic recording of a sexual act
("shot" refers to the photography, not the ejaculation).
Andreas