Yeah, I don't see how this is at all relevant to the gender gap. Please
moderate the sender.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 1:27 PM, George Herbert <george.herbert(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
I was going back and forth on speaking up myself, but I concur.
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 18, 2014, at 1:21 PM, Nathan <nawrich(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello the moderators, I think the legal threats implied in this e-mail
(and the other) are sufficient to warrant moderating the sender.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Romana Busse <romana.busse(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Dear Mr. Davies
From
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee#Members
I observe you are an "inactive" Member of this alleged committee. I
hence suspect that your email is bogus.
Accordingly I would appreciate receiving a signed email, or even a
scanned signed email clearly given on behalf of the Arbitration
Committee listing its physical address for service of legal process.
I am shocked by the casual and secretive approach adopted to such
concerns of child pornography, especially when it was previously made
on another website
http://wikipediocracy.com, naming 2 of your users
"Sitush" and "Bishonen" using sexually colored language and
referring
to child pornography on your website. This Sitush is a serial stalker
and harasser of female Wikipedia editors as your Arbcom knows well..
It is certainly strange that I was blocked as a sock puppet at the
instance of these same 2 users (1 of whom is your Admin) when I
brought that message to their attention. It seems Wikipedia actively
discourages reporting such sexual harassment to Admins and wipes out
all trace of it from public gaze, to the extent of terminating the
account of the person who reported me for being an alleged
sockpuppet..
It is even stranger that you will not disclose / specify the multiple
accounts and IPs I am accused of using as an alleged sock puppet or
why I am accused of being an India Against Corruption sockpuppet when
I have never edited any page concerned with that body. It is very
strange that Arbcom will not comply with its own policies for this. .
It is clear that the Arbcom is covering up the actions of its
anonymous users implicated in child pornography by another website.
I urge you to reconsider as I firmly intend to pursue this matter and
investigate all your own antecedents on your inactions..
On 11/19/14, Roger Davies <roger.davies.wiki(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Romana Busse:
This is to acknowledge receipt of your emails of yesterday and today.
The Arbitration Committee is unable to assist you further in this
matter. Any further communications should be sent to:
legal(a)wikimedia.org
Roger Davies
Arbitration Committee
On 18/11/2014 15:41, Romana Busse wrote:
Dear Anthony (AGK)
I'm very sorry to bother you, but could I have a timeline with respect
to deletion, or not, of those images ?
With the welfare of the children in mind, I feel that the school, the
children's parents and the local child welfare committees, magistrates
and police should be properly sensitized to the incidents of that
day, and to ensure it cannot reoccur
I'm sure the police and the Indian Govt Cyber Advisory Committee would
be interested in learning from you or NYBrad the finer points of law
whereby Citizendium encyclopedia decides to completely wipes out the
images within 12 hours but Wikipedia has not done anything till now on
identical complaint.
I would also like to know by when you will publish across all
Wikipedia projects the complete list of accounts and IPs I have
allegedly used, and also if I am a sockpuppet of User:MehulWB as
alleged or not. This is required by your same policy WP:SOCK under
which was blocked.
Thanks
On 11/18/14, Romana Busse <romana.busse(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> This is about a potential threat to clearly identifiable Indian minor
> school children whose images are retained on WMF servers in USA and
> India despite legal notice to remove them.
> Taken within their school (where their parents expected the same
> degree of privacy as they enjoy at home) and uploaded without their
> permission, consent or knowledge, at a location where they allegedly
> viewed grossly obscene pornography accessed on a Wikimedia Foundation
> service which has now been disabled on complaint by a body called
> [[India Against Corruption]].
_______________________________________________
ArbCom-appeals-en mailing list
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BASC
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/arbcom-appeals-en
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap