Yeah, I don't see how this is at all relevant
to the gender gap. Please
moderate the sender.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 1:27 PM, George Herbert <
george.herbert(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I was going back and forth on speaking up myself, but I concur.
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 18, 2014, at 1:21 PM, Nathan <nawrich(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello the moderators, I think the legal threats implied in this e-mail
(and the other) are sufficient to warrant moderating the sender.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Romana Busse <romana.busse(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> Dear Mr. Davies
>
> From
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee#Members
> I observe you are an "inactive" Member of this alleged committee. I
> hence suspect that your email is bogus.
>
> Accordingly I would appreciate receiving a signed email, or even a
> scanned signed email clearly given on behalf of the Arbitration
> Committee listing its physical address for service of legal process.
>
> I am shocked by the casual and secretive approach adopted to such
> concerns of child pornography, especially when it was previously made
> on another website
http://wikipediocracy.com, naming 2 of your users
> "Sitush" and "Bishonen" using sexually colored language and
referring
> to child pornography on your website. This Sitush is a serial stalker
> and harasser of female Wikipedia editors as your Arbcom knows well..
>
> It is certainly strange that I was blocked as a sock puppet at the
> instance of these same 2 users (1 of whom is your Admin) when I
> brought that message to their attention. It seems Wikipedia actively
> discourages reporting such sexual harassment to Admins and wipes out
> all trace of it from public gaze, to the extent of terminating the
> account of the person who reported me for being an alleged
> sockpuppet..
>
> It is even stranger that you will not disclose / specify the multiple
> accounts and IPs I am accused of using as an alleged sock puppet or
> why I am accused of being an India Against Corruption sockpuppet when
> I have never edited any page concerned with that body. It is very
> strange that Arbcom will not comply with its own policies for this. .
>
> It is clear that the Arbcom is covering up the actions of its
> anonymous users implicated in child pornography by another website.
>
> I urge you to reconsider as I firmly intend to pursue this matter and
> investigate all your own antecedents on your inactions..
>
> On 11/19/14, Roger Davies <roger.davies.wiki(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Romana Busse:
> >
> > This is to acknowledge receipt of your emails of yesterday and today.
> >
> > The Arbitration Committee is unable to assist you further in this
> > matter. Any further communications should be sent to:
> >
> > legal(a)wikimedia.org
> >
> > Roger Davies
> > Arbitration Committee
> >
> >
> >
> > On 18/11/2014 15:41, Romana Busse wrote:
> >> Dear Anthony (AGK)
> >>
> >> I'm very sorry to bother you, but could I have a timeline with
> respect
> >> to deletion, or not, of those images ?
> >>
> >> With the welfare of the children in mind, I feel that the school,
> the
> >> children's parents and the local child welfare committees,
> magistrates
> >> and police should be properly sensitized to the incidents of that
> >> day, and to ensure it cannot reoccur
> >>
> >> I'm sure the police and the Indian Govt Cyber Advisory Committee
> would
> >> be interested in learning from you or NYBrad the finer points of
> law
> >> whereby Citizendium encyclopedia decides to completely wipes out the
> >> images within 12 hours but Wikipedia has not done anything till now
> on
> >> identical complaint.
> >>
> >> I would also like to know by when you will publish across all
> >> Wikipedia projects the complete list of accounts and IPs I have
> >> allegedly used, and also if I am a sockpuppet of User:MehulWB as
> >> alleged or not. This is required by your same policy WP:SOCK under
> >> which was blocked.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> On 11/18/14, Romana Busse <romana.busse(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> This is about a potential threat to clearly identifiable Indian
> minor
> >>> school children whose images are retained on WMF servers in USA and
> >>> India despite legal notice to remove them.
> >>> Taken within their school (where their parents expected the same
> >>> degree of privacy as they enjoy at home) and uploaded without their
> >>> permission, consent or knowledge, at a location where they
> allegedly
> >>> viewed grossly obscene pornography accessed on a Wikimedia
> Foundation
> >>> service which has now been disabled on complaint by a body called
> >>> [[India Against Corruption]].
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> ArbCom-appeals-en mailing list
> >>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BASC
> >>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/arbcom-appeals-en
> >>
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gendergap mailing list
> Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org