The image was not of someone gardening naked. It was a sexy picture of a
very attractive young woman. Just imagine the same picture with the woman
fully clothed and ask yourself if this picture would illustrate a general
article about gardening. If I had to take a picture to illustrate naked
gardening, I would have ask the model to bend her knees (because it is much
more confortable) and I would have taken the picture from the opposite
angle, with a focus one her hands which is actually the part of her body
she uses to garden (or maybe there is a way to garden with one's vulva my
grandparents never teached me of).
If you're still no convinced, just compare with
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naked_hiking : people on the picture are
hiking, not sexy posing while pretending to hike.
Caroline
2012/4/7 Carol Moore DC <carolmooredc(a)verizon.net>
On 4/7/2012 10:35 AM, Bob Sponge wrote:
welcome to censorpedia
we fight probalbly sexism with our own middle-age-view on the world
and oppress any non appreciated right for free expression
than we told the critics idiots
The photo is obviously more about a sexy and stimulating phyical stance
taken by
a naked female than about illustrating the article's point. Just
like a picture emphasizing an erect penis would be. There's a difference
between censorship and avoiding prurient WP:Undue.
______________________________**_________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/gendergap<https://lists.w…