No!
Quality rapidly decreases when you force unpaid people to rush reviewing so
the queue looks better.
Last time people rushed pywikibot reviewers, lots of junk was committed,
creating lots of bugs, and the tree has been red for months now, making it
more difficult to merge old large changesets. Busy work. By unpaid people.
Because paid people complain about the queue.
We recently lost a very good reviewer & +2'er, putting a large spanner in
the system. But other than that you will see pywikibot has been very active
.
On 13 May 2016 04:17, "Jon Robson" <jdlrobson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I'm keen for us give attention to people who have
open patchsets that
they are looking for review. We had the first code review office hours
today and I hope in the long term during this hour we can work on
reviewing patchsets from this search:
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/q/(+label:Code-Review%253D0+OR+NOT+(label:…
Pywikibot has 145 open patches on Gerrit.
You can see them all here:
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/q/status:open+project:pywikibot/core+(+lab…
Can someone who is familiar with this codebase commit to helping
getting all these reviewed?
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l