Yes, we lack efficient and effective ways of cross-listing conversations,
which might be another use case for which the Collaboration team might
engineer some solutions, possibly involving Echo and/or Flow. (:
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Rachel diCerbo <rdicerb(a)wikimedia.org>
wrote:
I wonder if the most effective place to have and
follow conversations about
a product are on that product's page, rather than Lila's Talk page or
WM-L.
The main page to talk about Echo notifications overall is here:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:Echo_(Notifications)
A particular problem is that that page is Flowized and I know that many
users prefer original Talk pages - but the RfC page allows for Talk page
format. It's here:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:Requests_for_comment/Cross-wiki_notific…
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Brian Wolff <bawolff(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday, November 15, 2015, Pine W
<wiki.pine(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> The discussion about Flothat I referened is currently happening on
Lila's
> talk page on Meta. Would you like to join
the conversation there? The
> discussion there might get more staff attention than Wikimedia-l. (I
hear
a
number of staff avoid Wikimedia-l because they
find the tone to be
hostile
and/or because the volume is more than they can
handle.)
You really think the staff that dont follow wikimedia-l are going to
follow
lila's talk page?
--bawolff
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
--
Rachel diCerbo
Director of Community Engagement (Product)
Wikimedia Foundation
Rdicerb (WMF) <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rdicerb_%28WMF%29
@a_rachel
<https://twitter.com/a_rachel>
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l