On 12/01/15 17:11, Jay Ashworth wrote:
I personally attribute that to "we're so small, we have to cave on this point or no one will know we're here", a problem a small journal might have, but which Wikipedia certainly does not.
Do you suppose Physical Review (the lumbering giant of physics publishing) has that problem?
http://journals.aps.org/prb/accepted/99078Yc6K231ec4c06a66cd9e85c6575ddf278adc
Or PLOS ONE?
http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0107794
Or Philosophical Transactions A?
http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/373/2035/20140347
All have share links.
-- Tim Starling