Hi,
Please check it again. It should be open now.
The main open question is "Can third-party Phabricator development be
staged and tested on labs and then merged into a downstream production
repo?"
Thank you for your help,
Christopher
On 18 September 2014 13:02, Quim Gil <qgil(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
I'm very excited to see that you have something
working!
On Thursday, September 18, 2014, Christopher Johnson <
christopher.johnson(a)wikimedia.de> wrote:
Hi,
We have independently tested the third party "library" for sprint
burndown
No we cannot. Anonymous users can't see it (Public policy is missing, I
guess), and registration is restricted to @wikimedia.de emails.
Despite being hacked in to the libphutil as a library, though it is
phabricator dependent, it works on a basic level.
We would require
further
modification of the code for it to work for us,
however.
What would it take to get this into the test instance
https://phab
-01.wmflabs.org/ ? Is this labs test puppet cloning a development repo?
Also, how will core and library code changes to phabricator be deployed
to
the production instance?
Where shall we put this phabricator-sprint code so that we can work on it
with the intention of having it reviewed and deployed in production as
soon
as possible?
--
Quim Gil
Engineering Community Manager @ Wikimedia Foundation
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Qgil
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l