Do we have any similar data which shows how neglected certain users are?
I would be interesting in knowing for a given user what is the average
time it takes for their patches to get attention.
It would be good to give these developers more attention to keep them
more engaged.
pseudo code:
users_patches = get_patches_for_user( $username )
avg_time = 0;
foreach( $patches as $patch ) {
time = today - patch.created
avg_time += today - patch.created
}
avg_time /= len( $patches )
echo $username + ': ' + days(avg_time)
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 6:44 AM, Brad Jorsch (Anomie)
<bjorsch(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Jeff Janes
<jeff.janes(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I've noticed that when I submitted patches to
review, it used to send
out emails inviting people to review it. The last several patches I've
submitted did not generates such emails (or at least if it did, I was
not CC'ed on it).
The way the emails work is that people get added if the change matches the
configurations at
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Git/Reviewers. If you
don't happen to match anyone's rules, you won't get any reviewers
automatically added.
When that happens, you could check
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Developers/Maintainers to see if anyone is
listed for relevant components. It's also usually helpful to look through
the git log for the code you're changing, pick out some similar changesets,
and see who authored and reviewed them.
--
Brad Jorsch (Anomie)
Software Engineer
Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l