Im not saying that it shouldnt be allowed, what I am saying is if we are going to brainstorm on the topic, these issues are the most obvious and critical problems. I saw scotts last email and think that given those limited constraints its possible without too much fuss.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 2:41 PM, C. Scott Ananian cananian@wikimedia.org wrote:
I think allowing post-facto modification of edit summaries in the very limited case where the edit was done by the current user, the edit summary is currently blank, and the new summary is non-blank could be allowed with only small amounts wiki-burning.
Review tools would have to be updated so that janitors can patrol the newly-added edit summaries, since that might happen long after the actual content of the edit was patrolled. And for a full log of actions performed we'd need to record the timestamp of the summary edit in a field separate from the timestamp of the revision itself.
But that's a decent amount of work (and UI) to implement what is now a very limited use case.
Editing commit summaries works in git (and in gerrit) because there is a clear boundary between "private work" and "published (merged) work". I can rebase/edit the summary up until my work is published/merged.
I think the wiki would be benefited by the adoption of more of these git-inspired workflows... but that's a whole 'nuther discussion. --scott
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Amir E. Aharoni amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
Mmm... the fact that something as odd as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Dummy_edit even exists says something about the need for such a feature.
-- Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי http://aharoni.wordpress.com “We're living in pieces, I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore
2014-11-13 21:06 GMT+02:00 James Forrester jforrester@wikimedia.org:
On 13 November 2014 19:04, Derric Atzrott <datzrott@alizeepathology.com
wrote:
Am I missing something? I just tried making a null edit and it
didn't
change the edit summary.
It doesn't change the edit summary; it was suggested you make a null edit, but leave an edit summary for that null edit. This way you can make an edit that only serves the purpose of saying "Hey the previous edit had a wrong edit summary, this is what I really did."
A null edit doesn't save; you probably mean an inconsequential / trivial edit, instead?
J.
James D. Forrester Product Manager, Editing Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
jforrester@wikimedia.org | @jdforrester _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
-- (http://cscott.net)
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l