Jon Robson schreef op 2014/11/13 10:59:
I think this is a great idea and has always baffled me that you can't.
I'm also a little confused by James comment. Maintaining an edit history of edit summaries seems overkill. As I understand it edit summaries are for aiding other editors.
If we are worried about losing important information, maybe only the original editor and trusted editors with certain privileges should be able to edit them.
As rarely as I side with James, I would be up in arms if people tried to introduce the ability to edit edit summaries without even a log. Using an edit summary laced with obscenities and invectives is an unfortunately common form of attack. To make it possible to do so, leave it up until your victim sees it, and then erase all traces of the attack would be an administrative nightmare.
KWW