Jon Robson schreef op 2014/11/13 10:59:
I think this is a great idea and has always baffled me
that you can't.
I'm also a little confused by James comment. Maintaining an edit
history of edit summaries seems overkill. As I understand it edit
summaries are for aiding other editors.
If we are worried about losing important information, maybe only the
original editor and trusted editors with certain privileges should be
able to edit them.
As rarely as I side with James, I would be up in arms if people tried to
introduce the ability to edit edit summaries without even a log. Using
an edit summary laced with obscenities and invectives is an
unfortunately common form of attack. To make it possible to do so, leave
it up until your victim sees it, and then erase all traces of the attack
would be an administrative nightmare.
KWW