On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Derric Atzrott
<datzrott(a)alizeepathology.com> wrote:
Indeed - I am
somewhat surprised by James's firm opposition.
I tend to agree with James on this one in that if the edit summaries
are to be modified then they need a revision history.
Typos in edit summary are fixed by releasing an
errata corrige in a
subsequent dummy edit.
I question whether or not the ability to change edit summaries is
really a needed feature though. I would prefer the approach that
Nemo recommend of making a dummy edit.
This would work a little better if we had
the feature requested on
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33943
(Grouping edit history). But I don't see a reason against
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13937
(Correcting edit summaries (if own, last, & recent))
Helder