On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Greg Grossmeier greg@wikimedia.org wrote:
<quote name="Federico Leva (Nemo)" date="2014-02-15" time="22:52:31 +0100"> > And surely, before WMF/"MediaWiki" tell the world that no free fonts > of good quality exist, there will be some document detailing exactly > why and based on what arguments/data/research the numerous free > alternatives were all rejected? Free fonts developers are an > invaluable resource for serving Wikimedia projects' content in all > languages, we shouldn't carelessly slap them in their face.
I just skimmed the entire thread again, and yes, this has been requested a few times but no one from the WMF Design team has responded with that analysis (or if would respond with an analysis). The first time it was requested the person was told to ask the Design list, then the next message CC'd the design list, but no response on that point.
I don't see much on https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Typography_refresh nor it's talk page. Nor https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Design/Typography
cc'ing the Design list :)
Update on this: after discussing with Greg, Jared, etc. I've edited wikitech Deployments calendar to reflect a longer term goal of mid to late March at the earliest.
The calls from Greg, Kaldari, Nemo and others for better documentation are 100% correct, and it's something we should do before we move to merge anything from the typography refresh in to Vector proper. There's a better FAQ and more in development by the design team, but getting that out and properly translated in just a week is not realistic. Overall the continued discussion on Wikitech-l suggestions to me that doing this by the 27th would be a rush job.
Note that there was a small update to the feature on Friday, which removed the max-width restriction and tweaked some padding. I'd encourage anyone who hasn't tried the beta feature in a few weeks to give it another shot. We'll update Typography Refresh and the accompanying Talk page on mediawiki.org accordingly.
Thanks,