Then there's something wrong somewhere since what is eventually perceived by active "remote" community is just a wall of semi-clueless decisionism.
Vito
Inviato con AquaMail per Android http://www.aqua-mail.com
Il 11 agosto 2014 11:45:56 Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com ha scritto:
Hoi, This is simply not true. At Wikimania there were several sessions where the topic was what will the technical underpinnings be of our software. It was also discussed to some extend what kind of effect things may have on a community. When you are in those conversations you realise that many complications are considered; it is not easy nor obvious. Thanks, GerardM
NB there is not one community, there are many with often completely diverging opinions. Technically it is not possible to always keep backward compatibility / functionality. We are not backward we need to stay contemporary.
On 11 August 2014 10:36, svetlana svetlana@fastmail.com.au wrote:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2014, at 19:20, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi, Code review should be a strictly technical process surely. However the community CANNOT decide on everything. The WMF has one codebase for MediaWiki and it explicitly defines with long lead times the things it is working on. It does invite the community to be involved in the process.
It does not. It first designs a software and implements it, and then /tweaks/ it. Community should be asked what it'd like much, much earlier. Community participation in product design is currently impossible.
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l