It looks like Nemo has been doing this (thanks a bunch Nemo) but I wasn't cc'ed on any of these reports so I was getting just as frustrated as you thinking we were inside a black hole :)
I don't expect the average user to raise bugs.
This would be a great thing to discuss in the retrospective - as soon as a beta feature stops being a beta feature, we should have flushed the contents of the typography talk page and asked that people raise bugs or at least we/i should have been more attentive and raised bugs on behalf of those users to ensure that common problems could be collated and addressed.
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Erwin Dokter erwin@darcoury.nl wrote:
On 11-04-2014 20:00, Jon Robson wrote:
Please don't accuse me of things that are not true. I do want to see these things, but I have to manage 1) mailing lists 2) bugzilla 3) wiki pages (which i have to know exist). I am only human. Thanks for the links to bugs I've cc'ed myself on all of these.
That was not my intention, I'm sorry. But I am getting so frustrated because the foundation keeps giving the impression that it does not even acknowledge that there is a problem, or at least refuses to remedy it by clinging on the currently broken implementaion.
Since that page was linked as the primary feedback page when the refresh was announced, it should be the first place to check for error reports. Claiming non-existence of Bugzilla reports is just plain selective ignorance.
I disagree. Bugzilla is where we report bugs. If no one raises bugs as they will go lost.
Then that should have been in the FAQ. The announcement only sends the readers to the talk page to give feedback.
Regards,
Erwin Dokter
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l