..
By "lower quality" I mean both subjectively, but also objectively. For
example, today I was reading
https://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Hamilton_wins_%27incredible%27_Bahrain_race,_F…
(enwikinews is one of the few wikis I haven't overridden the font
changes with css). At first I thought there was a typo in the image
caption toward the end of the page, an extra space between "prote" and
"stor". But no, the kerning on the font chosen is just literally that
bad, that you can't tell if it is an extra space, or just a kerning
error. I call that objectively bad (There's other things I don't like
about the font choice, but they are more touchy-feely subjective)
I can reproduce this. It looks _very_ bad on Firefox/Fedora Core 19,
and but it also appears to a lesser degree on Chrome/Fedora Core 19.
Compare it against monobook