On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Quim Gil qgil@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Friday, April 4, 2014, Brad Jorsch (Anomie) bjorsch@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Quim Gil <qgil@wikimedia.org
wrote:
The queue of open chagesets keeps growing.
Does "open" include changesets that were submitted, got feedback, and
then
the submitter never bothered to follow up?
Yes, shouldn't we?
It seems a little premature to me to worry about "our number of open changesets keeps growing!" and "we have changesets that have been open for a really long time!" when we don't know how many are due to this factor that we have no control over (beyond marking them abandoned as stale, counting on the submitter to unabandon if they ever come back).
Maybe abandoning old changesets with -1 reviews as stale with an appropriate message is something that should be done. I don't know.