On 9 May 2013 18:29, Daniel Friesen <daniel(a)nadir-seen-fire.com> wrote:
On Wed, 08 May 2013 03:52:07 -0700, Daniel Friesen
<
daniel(a)nadir-seen-fire.com> wrote:
I was going through our code contemplating dropping XHTML 1.1 support and
ran into the RDFa support stuff and realized how
out of date and limited it
is.
I've put together an RFC for replacing our code that appears to be based
on the RDFa 1.0 from 2008 with RDFa 1.1 and expanding support for RDFa.
https://www.mediawiki.org/**wiki/Requests_for_comment/**
Update_our_code_to_use_RDFa_1.**1_instead_of_RDFa_1.0<https://www.mediaw…
Is no-one at all interested in RDFa?
No opposition. No enthusiasm. No... "Just go ahead and do it"?
I'm in favour. :-) Seems a sensible change all round, and there don't
appear to be reasons against.
J.
--
James D. Forrester
Product Manager, VisualEditor
Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
jforrester(a)wikimedia.org | @jdforrester