Matthew Flaschen writes:
That would be great.
I see that's already been taken care of
Yes, doing it all client-side would probably be best
for performance and
responsiveness, but some server-side involvement may be okay. However,
the current implementation at
http://lilypond.org/schikkers/?user=demo
of responding with a JavaScript version of a full SVG document for each
change does raise performance questions.
Sure, this demo still leaves much room for improvement and I would not
suggest to use it as it is. It's pretty useless to work on performance
if minimal required functionality is lacking, so that's one of the
things I would like to hear.
I don't think they've been contacted about the
VisualEditor. They were
emailed when the Score extension was in-progress, and they I assume they
know about that by now.
Yes, of course. Thanks,
Jan
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke(a)gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond
http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT
http://JoyofSource.com | AvatarĀ®
http://AvatarAcademy.nl