Matthew Flaschen writes:
That would be great.
I see that's already been taken care of
Yes, doing it all client-side would probably be best for performance and responsiveness, but some server-side involvement may be okay. However, the current implementation at http://lilypond.org/schikkers/?user=demo of responding with a JavaScript version of a full SVG document for each change does raise performance questions.
Sure, this demo still leaves much room for improvement and I would not suggest to use it as it is. It's pretty useless to work on performance if minimal required functionality is lacking, so that's one of the things I would like to hear.
I don't think they've been contacted about the VisualEditor. They were emailed when the Score extension was in-progress, and they I assume they know about that by now.
Yes, of course. Thanks, Jan