Yuvi Panda writes:
Hello! Our current generated documentation[1] uses
doxygen, and
leaves... a number of things to be desired - such as:
What about a bug report [or a patch ;-)]?
Jan
1. Not be tortoise slow
2. Have usable search
3. Prettier interface
I was looking around for alternatives, and ran into phpdocumentor2[2].
The project still seems active (latest commit was 3 days ago, and for
vagrant support!), and the demo was quite pretty:
http://demo.phpdoc.org/Responsive/namespaces/phpDocumentor.html
Is there any particular reason we are still sticking with doxygen? Or
is it just 'someone needs to find the time to move things over to the
new system'?
[1]:
https://doc.wikimedia.org/mediawiki-core/master/php/html/
[2]:
http://www.phpdoc.org/
--
Yuvi Panda T
http://yuvi.in/blog
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke(a)gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond
http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT
http://JoyofSource.com | AvatarĀ®
http://AvatarAcademy.nl