Huh! News to me as well. I definitely agree with that decision. Thanks, Ori!
I've already written the Varnish code for setting X-MF-Mode so it can be
captured by varnishncsa. Is there agreement to switch to Mobile-Mode, or at
least, MF-Mode?
Looking especially to hear from Arthur and Matt.
--
David Schoonover
dsc(a)wikimedia.org
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Diederik van Liere
<dvanliere(a)wikimedia.org>wrote;wrote:
Thanks Ori, I was not aware of this
D
Sent from my iPhone
On 2013-02-02, at 16:55, Ori Livneh <ori(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
On Saturday, February 2, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Platonides wrote:
I don't like it's cryptic nature.
Someone looking at the headers sent to his browser would be very
confused about what's the point of «X-MF-Mode: b».
Instead something like this would be much more descriptive:
X-Mobile-Mode: stable
X-Mobile-Request: secondary
But that also means sending more bytes through the wire :S
Well, you can (and
should) drop the 'X-' :-)
See
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6648: Deprecating the "X-" Prefix and
Similar Constructs in Application Protocols
--
Ori Livneh
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l