On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Denny Vrandečić
<denny.vrandecic(a)wikimedia.de> wrote:
That looks like a cool idea.
I am trying to experiment it on a few pages, and it seems to considerably
reduce the number of web requests (for
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vincent_van_Gogh it goes from 120 to under 40
requests).
But the pages get quite bigger, obviously.
Which one is larger (given an empty cache)? One single big file
containing the thumbnails or one small HTML file and individual
thumbnail files (that includes possible overhead in the TCP/IP
packages for both scenarios)?
Mathias