Those are very good points, both of them. Thanks.
2013/4/9 Matthew Flaschen mflaschen@wikimedia.org
On 04/09/2013 12:18 PM, Denny Vrandečić wrote:
I thought that in order to discuss these design decisions with the community before hand, telling them on their respective village pump is sufficient. Not so it seems. No single channel would find acceptance to communicate with the community. This, obviously means, that it is not actionable to communicate with the community.
First of all, some people (including on English Wikipedia) are quite happy with the idea of deploying Wikidata Phase II. Those who are not seem to be arguing for a community-wide RFC before allowing deployment. It does not seem that they are arguing no one was notified.
What about setting up a community selected body of representatives to discuss such issues beforehand? At first, it sounds like a good idea -
but
the issue is, it makes the process only more complicated without at all resolving the underlying issues. Does anyone really think that such a
body
would stop the criticism before or after the deployment of the change in question? Yeah, right. Doesn't change a thing.
Yeah, I do not think this is a good idea. When something does need a community decision (not saying everything does), I don't think some new special council will help anything. That would basically introduce indirect democracy in place of direct consensus. Community-wide RFCs are not always smooth, but they do usually work.
Matt Flaschen
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l