Am Mo 15.04.2013 13:38, schrieb Bartosz Dziewoński:
On Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:31:13 +0200, Lukas Benedix benedix@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
I can't find any rules like this for Gadgets, but I see lot's of Gadgets set default in several Wikis. I think Gadgets can be designed badly and have security flaws as well as Extensions… so there shouldn't there exists some review process?
There should. But it's impossible in practice, as the gadgets are written by volunteers for other volunteers, who often have very limited free time, and who often couldn't care less whether the code is nice or not if it works.
I fully agree on that. There are to many Gadgets to review all of them, but I think there should be a design- and codereview at least before a Gadget is set to default.