Hi,
Is there any written policy about the review-process for Gadgets?
For Extensions I found a document, that says an Extension should: get a
design review, be internationalized, get a code review and finally get a
deployment review.
[
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Writing_an_extension_for_deployment]
I can't find any rules like this for Gadgets, but I see lot's of Gadgets
set default in several Wikis. I think Gadgets can be designed badly and
have security flaws as well as Extensions… so there shouldn't there
exists some review process?
best regards,
Lukas