On 04/03/2013 11:58 AM, Yury Katkov wrote:
Why? SMW is already here, it's documented beautifully, it has good performance, active community and it is NOT developing by Wikimedia Foundation, which is good political decision for the MediaWiki.org portal which aimed to be closer to 3rd party developers.
+1
I haven't understood the resistance of the WMF to use SMW in more places, but putting it on MW.o would really make MW.o's non-WMF focus clear.
Of course, if the WMF had some objective reason to avoid SMW, now would be a good time to clarify what those objections are.