On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 01:26:43 -0700, Denny Vrandečić denny.vrandecic@wikimedia.de wrote:
Daniel,
regarding the sites management:
Since the last activity on the discussion page was from August 26, and the last substantial change to the RFC itself was from August 21, and the patch set has been there since September 12 -- without any comments, by the way -- I hope you find it understandable when I express a certain frustration with a comment like "it still needs discussion".
This change to the code is blocking us. If it needs discussion, then please discuss it. But being silent for several weeks, even a month, while people are working on this and spending resources at this, and then suddenly saying "oh wait, I think it still needs some discussion" is not very respectful of the work done by others. We have invited for discussion several times, and you have been one of the most active in the discussions.
I already started the discussion ages ago. No-one replied.
So, please, at least be as helpful as to say what imperfection in the current state of affairs irks you, so that we can discuss them and work on them. Otherwise your comment merely leads to an increase in frustration, and I do not see how it helps us improve MediaWiki.
Sorry if the words are received as harsh, Denny
2012/9/20 Daniel Friesen daniel@nadir-seen-fire.com:
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:53:54 -0700, Denny Vrandečić denny.vrandecic@wikimedia.de wrote:
Hi all,
here's our weekly list of Wikidata review items. Due to the hands-on meeting last week we refrained from sending it earlier. Now that most should be back home, I wanted to give an overview of the open items before our telco tomorrow.
- ContentHandler. This one is seriously blocking us now, and we would
need to get it reviewed. It is our highest priority right now. The review was promised for this week. We are eagerly awaiting the review and further input. Here's the bug: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38622
- Sites. The RFC seems to be stable:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/New_sites_system Chad was reminded one and half weeks ago to take a look, and since no further input has come in we assume that it is acceptable, which is why we started with the implementation work. Here's the link to the patch: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/23528/
The Sitelinks topic still needs discussion.
- jQuery table sorting improvements. This improves the UI on initial
display of a sorted table. There has been some comments and updates, thanks to Krinkle for the review and comments. The work is ongoing here, the ball is in our courtyard, we are working on the new patchset: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/22562/
- Towards nested transactions (2):
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/21584/ open with comments from Aaron Schulz.
Got merged since last mail:
- userWasLastToEdit improvement.
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/22049/ Yay! Thanks to Demon.
- Towards nested transactions (1):
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/21582/ got merged! Yay! Thanks to Aaron Schulz.
Thanks for everyone, especially to Demon, Krinkle, The DJ, Dantman, Matmarex, and Aaron Schulz for reviewing, and Rob, Tim, and Chad who participated in the phone conference last week.
It would be crucial to get the first two items off this list as soon as possible.
Cheers, Denny
-- ~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l