Daniel,
regarding the sites management:
Since the last activity on the discussion page was from August 26, and
the last substantial change to the RFC itself was from August 21, and
the patch set has been there since September 12 -- without any
comments, by the way -- I hope you find it understandable when I
express a certain frustration with a comment like "it still needs
discussion".
This change to the code is blocking us. If it needs discussion, then
please discuss it. But being silent for several weeks, even a month,
while people are working on this and spending resources at this, and
then suddenly saying "oh wait, I think it still needs some discussion"
is not very respectful of the work done by others. We have invited for
discussion several times, and you have been one of the most active in
the discussions.
So, please, at least be as helpful as to say what imperfection in the
current state of affairs irks you, so that we can discuss them and
work on them. Otherwise your comment merely leads to an increase in
frustration, and I do not see how it helps us improve MediaWiki.
Sorry if the words are received as harsh,
Denny
2012/9/20 Daniel Friesen <daniel(a)nadir-seen-fire.com>om>:
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:53:54 -0700, Denny Vrandečić
<denny.vrandecic(a)wikimedia.de> wrote:
Hi all,
here's our weekly list of Wikidata review items. Due to the hands-on
meeting last week we refrained from sending it earlier. Now that most
should be back home, I wanted to give an overview of the open
items before our telco tomorrow.
* ContentHandler. This one is seriously blocking us now, and we would
need to get it reviewed. It is our highest priority right now. The
review was promised for this week. We are eagerly awaiting the review
and further input. Here's the bug:
<https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38622>
* Sites. The RFC seems to be stable:
<https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/New_sites_system>
Chad was reminded one and half weeks ago to take a look, and since no
further input has come in we assume that it is acceptable, which is
why we started with the implementation work. Here's the link to the
patch: <https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/23528/>
The Sitelinks topic still needs discussion.
* jQuery table sorting improvements. This improves the UI on initial
display of a sorted table. There has been some comments and updates,
thanks to Krinkle for the review and comments. The work is ongoing
here, the ball is in our courtyard, we are working on the new
patchset: <https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/22562/>
* Towards nested transactions (2):
<https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/21584/> open with comments from
Aaron Schulz.
Got merged since last mail:
* userWasLastToEdit improvement.
<https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/22049/> Yay! Thanks to Demon.
* Towards nested transactions (1):
<https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/21582/> got merged! Yay! Thanks to
Aaron Schulz.
Thanks for everyone, especially to Demon, Krinkle, The DJ, Dantman,
Matmarex, and Aaron Schulz for reviewing, and Rob, Tim, and Chad who
participated in the phone conference last week.
It would be crucial to get the first two items off this list as soon
as possible.
Cheers,
Denny
--
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [
http://daniel.friesen.name]
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
--
Project director Wikidata
Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. | Obentrautstr. 72 | 10963 Berlin
Tel. +49-30-219 158 26-0 |
http://wikimedia.de
Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V.
Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg
unter der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das
Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.