On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Mark Holmquist <mtraceur(a)member.fsf.org> wrote:
And I really
don't like the idea of B. I can easily see people
mentioning bugs that are related to a commit in the commit message but
not directly fixed by it.
Maybe we should start a new branch per-bug instead, and merge the branch
when the bug is fixed? That might help with this issue.
I don't really like that idea either. How about instead of auto-closing, we
at least have Gerrit tell BZ a patch was committed/submitted? That would
save the "I've put a patch in <url>" step, and would prompt people on
the
CC list to possibly close when Gerrit says "Patch <foo> was submitted."
Gerrit could probably tweak the keywords as well.
-Chad