On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Rob Lanphier <robla(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Chad
<innocentkiller(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I disagree here. The wmf branches should always
be linear, and you
should never merge to it without accepting that it may get scapped.
Actually, you should never merge to master without accepting that it
may get scapped. Why have two layers here?
Well true, but I still don't see an instance where you'd merge
to master but *not* be willing to have it deployed.
-Chad