Hi y'all,
With the pending git migration upon us,is this also the right time to
think about naming conventions for git branches or is there nu such a
need?
I can imagine that a branch aimed at fixing a bug could be named
B12345, or something like that. Or are 'descriptive' names good
enough? One reason to have naming conventions is that it would make it
easier in the future to run scripts to collect stats on particular
branches. That would be much harder in a complete freetext
environment.
Best,
Diederik