Hi y'all,
With the pending git migration upon us,is this also the right time to think about naming conventions for git branches or is there nu such a need? I can imagine that a branch aimed at fixing a bug could be named B12345, or something like that. Or are 'descriptive' names good enough? One reason to have naming conventions is that it would make it easier in the future to run scripts to collect stats on particular branches. That would be much harder in a complete freetext environment.
Best,
Diederik