On 20/06/12 17:28, Tim Weyer (SVG) wrote:
'deleterevision' in its function of deleting revisions of a page or removing IP/username/comment is what I want it to be only. And if you tell it masking or suppressing is not a big difference. Okay, you only suppress the content of the log entry, so you mask it. But I know what I'm speaking about. If you wouldn't have 'deleterevision' permission, you would have to delete and undelete the page without the revision(s) you wanted to remove. If you have 'deleterevision' permission, you can easily remove the content (and the comment if needed; and if you want to remove the editor's name, you can do it too).
Masking log entries is another part and that's why I want to give it an extra permission called 'suppresslogentry'. You could also name it 'hidelogentry', but I think we should use it because of 'suppressrevision'. This permission's name does also include 'suppress' in its name even you can only hide log entries and revisions for administrators too.
Sébastien reply seemed to refer to the other. I think it's fine to make the separation you propose. Please open a bug for that if one doesn't already exist.