On 19 June 2012 21:19, Derric Atzrott <datzrott(a)alizeepathology.com> wrote:
Since both the
deployment review pipeline as well as the political decision
pipeline can be ~quite
long~ probably best to have it all supported so we
can just adjust a configuration file once we decide one way or another.
I agree with this idea. Not only does it make the
political process of
deciding what's best a little less painful (because it supports everything),
but it also allows non-WMF projects to make the decision for themselves. By
including not only the features needed by WMF projects we don't limit third
parties, which although not 100% necessary, it's a nice boon.
Hmm, yes. I concur.
- d.