2012/1/3 Erik Moeller <erik(a)wikimedia.org>rg>:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Strainu
<strainu10(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I wouldn't be so fast in leaving only the
sitename as sender name - a
mail from "Wikipedia" would raise my (manual) spam alarms, just like
emails from the "Federal Bureau of Investigations" or from "[X]
Bank".
Facebook's email messages come from "Facebook".
Twitter's email messages come from "Twitter".
Google Plus email messages come from "Google+".
Flickr's email messages come from "Flickr mail"
Linkedin's email messages come from different senders - by far the
best solution.
(Installed) Wordpress' emails come from different senders
AOL's (does anyone remember them?) emails come from different senders.
OpenTable email messages come from
"OpenTable".
Netflix email messages come from "Netflix".
Kickstarter email messages come from "Kickstarter".
Quora email messages come from "Quora".
I'll have to take your word on that, I don't use those services. :)
Not every wheel needs to be reinvented. :)
If you're not sure it's round, you're better off building it again or
it may crash you car.
The point is there really isn't a rule on this matter, it is just a
question of preference or marketing.
Strainu