On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 9:38 PM, Max Semenik <maxsem.wiki(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I think this is an agrument in favor of doing so in a
branch, rather
than the other way around.
A <del>rose</del><ins>folder</ins> by any other name would smell
as sweet.
I think Aaron's argument that IDEs may go bonkers
from two classes
with the same name is pretty compelling, no? What's the problem with
doing it in a branch?
Depends if John actually has plans to keep them the same, But since
from my understanding is that John is planning close to a complete
rewrite of the system, using different technologies and methods to
archive his desired outcomes, It might not be such a issue…
I never said there was a issue with doing it in a Branch, But since we
basically use them as folders it doesn't really matter where it is,
and as I have pointed out, He is redoing the whole thing (apparently)
and thus producing a new extension anyway, So there isn't really a
issue with doing it under /extensions compared to /branches.
The main concern here seems to be the actual name of said folder,
which will more than likely occur no matter where it ends up.